"EACH DISCOVERY REVEALS A NEW DIMENSION TO YOUR LEGACY"
THE UNFOLDING JOURNEY is a new blog written in association with Legacy Genealogy.
This blog is a blend of disciplines that reveal the rich texture of culture and history that surrounded your ancestors' lives, as well as your own. We will take you beyond just the names, dates, and places to give you the "back story" for the reasons your ancestors thought what they thought and did what they did. We invite you to also visit us at the Legacy Genealogy facebook page at http://facebook.com/legacygenealogy
Thursday, August 30, 2012
LEXINGTON AND CONCORD: THE
FIRST CONFLICT
On April 19, 1775, the
first armed conflict of the American Revolutionary War occurred at the small
towns of Lexington and Concord, in Massachusetts. The basics of the story of
that day have been passed down to us in a fairly accurate manner. But there are
stories about these engagements that have been lost over time. We have gathered
some here, but first we need to set the stage for what happened that day.
About
3,000 British troops were stationed in Boston. It was the seventh year of
military occupation. They were there to enforce the laws that Parliament and
the King had issued, many of which punished the Massachusetts Colony. While the
British had a strong hold on Boston, they had little control of the territory
outside of the city. The military governor, General Thomas Gage, received
secret orders from London for his troops to march to the town of Concord, where
intelligence believed that colonial militia had hidden an extensive cache of
weapons. If his men could capture or destroy the arms, further unrest may be
quelled.
What
the British didn’t know was that, thanks to a very active intelligence network,
the colonials had received word weeks earlier that a campaign would be
targeting their stock of arms. Before a strike could be organized, the weapons
and ammunition had been long since relocated to hiding places in other towns.
Gage gave each commander secret orders that they were not to open until under
way. But the colonials had already received the details of the plan even before
the British officers opened their orders. There is a story that says that the
source of the information leak was none other than Margaret Gage, the wife of
General Gage, who was known to be a colonial sympathizer (pictured here).
The plan also included the
capture of Samuel Adams and John Hancock. They left Boston 10 days earlier
having received word of the secret London instructions, even before Gage had
been notified. The two remained in Lexington until April 18th before
moving again.
On
the night of the 18th, William Dawes, Paul Revere (pictured here),
and Samuel Prescott set out on horseback to active the colonials “alarm and
muster” warning system that had been in place for months. As they alerted farms
along their way, others rang bells, beat drums, fired guns, and built bonfires
to spread the word of the troop’s advance. The Legend of Paul Revere has been
heightened by Longfellow’s poem “Paul Revere’s Ride” which says, “It was two by
the village clock when he came to the bridge in Concord town.” Well, Paul
Revere never made it to Concord. He ran into a British patrol and was captured.
We
have the image of a large, professional British army marching steadfastly
toward a ragged group of militia men. Actually, the British force was made up
of only about 700 men. The British march to Concord was disorganized from the
beginning. Colonel Francis Smith, the mission commander, was late arriving. The
troops were to be ferried across the river to Cambridge but the boat-loading
operation had been not been organized. When the troops disembarked, they had to
wade through waist deep water to get ashore. There was a long delay getting
their gear unloaded. It wasn’t until 2:00 am when they finally got moving; with
muddy shoes, wet uniforms, and with no extra ammunition (it had been neglected
to be issued).
The
Battle at Lexington was in reality not much of a battle at all; it was mostly a
staring contest. The British arrived at dawn. The 80 militiamen, who had been
waiting most of the night, spilled out of the Buckman Tavern and stood on the
village green, watching the soldiers. Spectators lined up along the road to
watch from a safer distance. John Parker, the militia commander, saw that he
was outmanned and decided not to engage the British; he also knew that the
colonist’s weapons had already been moved out of Concord. Parker thought that
the enemy would find that out and simply march back to Boston before midday.
His men were lined up in plain sight, and not blocking the road. But the regulars
prepared to advance and fired a volley that killed eight militiamen. Later the
British said that the colonials fired first. Some witnesses said that the first
shot fired (the “shot heard ‘round the world”) was from a colonial onlooker who
may have been inside the tavern. The soldiers charged with bayonets, and Parker
ordered his men to withdraw.
Most of the area’s
militiamen, the “minute men,” were organized and waiting near Concord, nearly
2,000 strong. When the British column arrived at Concord, they began to search
for military supplies. All they found were three cannons buried behind a tavern
and 550 pounds of musket balls, which were thrown into a pond. All of the
musket balls were recovered by the colonists after the British left.
The militiamen and the
British soldiers were about 50 yards apart, separated by the Concord River. The
colonists were told to load their muskets but not to fire unless fired at.
Suddenly, a shot rang out. There was no controversy this time that the shot
came from the British. Unlike Lexington, the soldiers found themselves
outnumbered. Many of them were young and not accustomed to combat. The tense
fight only lasted 10 minutes. The British troops began to flee. The Americans
were shocked by their victory. Some began to advance on the retreating
soldiers, but many simply went home to protect their families.
British
Commander Smith considered surrender. A rescue effort was launched by the
British that included 1,000 men. They arrived on the scene about 2:00 pm. But
in their haste to depart from Boston, they left the ammunition wagons behind.
Discovering this, Governor Gage dispatched the wagons, guarded by only 14 men.
The ammunition train was intercepted by a group of older former militiamen, all
well into their sixties, who demanded that they surrender. The British ignored
them. The old men opened fire and the soldiers threw their muskets into a
stream and surrendered.
General
William Heath, a colonist, ordered the men to surround the retreating British
and fire at them from a distance behind trees and stone walls to minimize
casualties. Militiamen on horseback would appear on the road ahead of the
British, dismount and fire; then remount and ride farther on to repeat the
tactic. Fresh militia arrived raising the colonial strength to 3,800. As the
British entered Cambridge, the militiamen emerged from their covered positions
and formed into regular battle lines. By the time the soldiers reached Boston
and safety, the city was surrounded by 15,000 armed colonists.
To win support for their
cause in England, the colonists collected testimonies from the militiamen and
captured soldiers that painted the British as the aggressors and the Americans
as innocent victims. They sent these documents to London on the fastest ship
available, and they were published in London newspapers two weeks before Gage’s
official military report arrived. This gave the colonists a political victory
to go along with their battlefield victory.
For the next 200 years,
popular perceptions of this first conflict of the Revolutionary War have
changed and many of the details have been lost. Today, Lexington and Concord
are seen as a symbol of a people standing up for their independence.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
“THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING!”
1968 had been a terrible
year so far. The “Summer of Love” the previous year was long forgotten.
Americans were greeted by newspapers and TV broadcasts telling them about the
Tet Offensive in Vietnam (January) which elevated the level of brutality a well
as increasing Lyndon Johnson’s determination to send more U.S. troops over
there. In April, Martin Luther King was assassinated in Memphis and riots broke
out across the country. Then in June, Robert Kennedy was shot in the head after
winning the California primary. Over 100 American universities had been shut
down by protests against the war. Lyndon Johnson’s approval rating dropped to
23%, and he decided not to run for another term. Hubert Humphrey entered the
presidential race in April. Many saw him as just “Johnson’s Man.”
If you are under forty
years old, you won’t remember what happened in Chicago between August 25th
and 29th in 1968. It’s only history. But if you are older, you may
recall one of the most divisive events in contemporary American history (in one
of the most tumultuous years). During those five days, the forces of the
“Establishment” and law and order faced off against the rising anger of the
“Anti-war” liberal youth of the country during the Democratic Party National
Convention. Violence spilled out onto the streets and parks of Chicago. It was
44 years ago this week.
The
primary reason for the demonstrations held outside the Democratic National
Convention was opposition to the war in Vietnam. The riots that ensued can be
blamed on both the protestors and the police. Most anti-war protestors were
anxious to ignite a confrontation with authorities and hoped that the national
TV networks would broadcast the outcome, raising sympathy for their cause. The
police, directed by Mayor Richard Daley, were just as determined to challenge
all threats to their authority and suppress any demonstration.
LEADING
UP TO THE CONVENTION
Many Democrats had wanted
to move the convention from Chicago to Miami. They were concerned about
logistical problems (a continuing telephone strike) and disruptive protests
outside. Most of all, they feared Mayor Richard Daley’s hard line when dealing
with demonstrators (he had given “shoot to kill” instructions to police during
the riots after MLK’s death). The television networks also wanted to move the
event to Miami. Daley would have none of it. He pledged to prohibit disorderly
protests, and threatened to withdraw Illinois’ delegate votes from Humphrey.
There was even a rumor that LBJ had said, “Miami is not an American city.”
Those
on both sides began their preparations well before the August convention. Young
left wing activists met in March to form an alliance and plan their protests.
The key organizers were David Dellinger (1915-2004) of the “National Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam” (MOBE) and Tom
Hayden and Rennie Davis, co-founders of the “Students for a Democratic Society”
(SDS), the parent organization of the “Weather Underground.” Joining them were
Abbie Hoffman pictured here (1936-1989) and Jerry Rubin (1938-1994), co-founders of the
“Youth International Party” (YIP) as well as two activist professors, Lee
Wiener (University of Oregon) and John Froines (Northwestern University, now
UCLA). Allied in principle, but with different tactical objectives, was the
Black Panther Party represented by its co-founder Bobby Seale. This group,
excluding Seale, would become known as the “Chicago Seven.”
In
April, during the demonstrations following the assassination of Martin Luther
King, Mayor Richard Daley ruled Chicago with an iron fist. His orders were to,
“shoot to kill any arsonist and shoot to maim or cripple anyone looting.” Three
weeks later, an anti-war march in Chicago drew 8,000 people; and when the march
ended, the police waded into the demonstrators with clubs. By late July, both
MOBE and the YIP Party applied for permits to camp in Lincoln Park, and to
march and rally for peace. All permits were denied.
Six
thousand Illinois National Guard troops were mobilized and trained in
riot-control tactics. At Ft. Hood in Texas, regular Army soldiers were being
prepared to be flown to Chicago for riot duty. The night before they were to
leave, some of them decided to refuse deployment. The next morning, 43 of the
soldiers were arrested, all were African Americans. For days prior to the
opening of the convention, potential protestors were trained in crowd
protection techniques, and in karate. Anyone in the know was convinced that a
violent confrontation was unavoidable.
SUNDAY
8-25
The day before the
convention commenced, 5,000 people had gathered for “The Festival of Life”
concert in Lincoln Park. After the program (and now after the curfew time),
most of the crowd began to leave the park ahead of a police sweep. A line of
police moved into the crowd, pushing it into the street. Many of the attendees
including reporters and photographers were clubbed and some arrested.
MONDAY 8-26
On this day, Mayor Daley
formally opened the convention. He promises the delegates, “As long as I’m
Mayor, there’s going to be law and order in Chicago.”
Hubert Humphrey arrived in
Chicago with the nomination effectively sewn up, having a 100 to 200 vote
margin in his favor. He had the support of Southern Democrats, African
Americans, and organized labor. Johnson had seen to it that delegates from
those states loyal to Humphrey were assigned to the best seats in the
convention hall.
In
spite of his delegate lead, Hubert Humphrey wasn’t expecting clear sailing.
After the death of Robert Kennedy, a number of state delegations decided to
remain uncommitted, hoping that Ted Kennedy would run in his brother’s place.
Daley also kept the Illinois delegation uncommitted. The weekend before the
convention, on network TV, Humphrey restated his position that he supported
Johnson’s pro-war policies. Delegations from 15 states tried to unseat Humphrey
delegates in favor of anti-war delegates.
That evening about 2,000
people had gathered in the park and built a makeshift barricade against the
police line. A police car that moved forward and knocked down the barricade is
battered with rocks. The police move in with tear gas. The violence is worse
than the previous night. Even some residents were pulled off their porches and
clubbed. More reporters are attacked on this night than at any other time.
TUESDAY
8-27
In
addition to the politicians and regular delegates, those inside attending the
convention included Paul Newman (delegate) and Arthur Miller (delegate) both
pictured here, Julian Bond (delegate), Joanne Woodward, Gore Vidal, Tony
Randal, Shirley MacLaine, Sonny Bono, Dinah Shore, and Warren Beatty.
Outside on the streets
were authors Norman Mailer, Terry Southern, and Allen Ginsberg; entertainers
Dick Gregory, Mary Travers, Phil Ochs, and Peter Yarrow; and Rev. Ralph
Abernathy. Also outside was the film crew of director Haskell Wexler who was
filming the demonstrations to be used in scenes for his motion picture “Medium
Cool.” His story takes place in Chicago in 1968, and uses real actors and a
fictional script combined with actual documentary film as background. It features
confrontations between the police and demonstrators. This 1969 film presents an
eerie but fascinating merging of art and politics.
During
the afternoon, about 200 members of the American Friends Service Committee and
other pacifist groups march toward the convention to ask the delegates to place
a peace provision into the Democratic Platform. They are joined by about 1,000
more marchers. A short time later, the police stop the march. After being
allowed to stay where they stood until the evening, the police then
aggressively move in to disperse them. Resistors were arrested. That night, Bobby
Seale speaks to a crowd urging people to defend themselves “by any means” if
attacked by the police.
That same evening, a group
of 200 clergy carrying a 12’ tall cross are joined by 2,000 demonstrators on
the edge of Lincoln Park. As soon as the curfew time arrives, tear gas and club
swinging police clear the park.
WEDNESDAY
8-28
Inside the convention the
most contentious issue by far was Vietnam. A debate was planned on the minority
proposal to include a “peace plank” in the party’s platform of stated beliefs.
The convention managers (largely controlled by Richard Daley) scheduled the
debate for late in the evening on Tuesday, after prime time TV coverage was
shut down. But the pro-peace delegates had staged a noisy protest that forced
the debate to be rescheduled to this afternoon. The Humphrey/Johnson position
on Vietnam was approved anyway. A huge and angry delegate demonstration followed.
The New York and California delegations sang “We Shall Overcome” and they were
joined by other states marching around the convention floor. Convention
controllers tried to hide the rebellious delegations (those favoring the peace
initiative) in the back of the hall and turned off their microphones.
While trying to get to a
Georgia delegate for an interview, correspondent Dan Rather was forcefully
grabbed by security guards and roughed up. CBS anchor Walter Cronkite directed
his attention, and the TV cameras, toward Rather who had his microphone headset
on. You could hear him say, “Don’t push me; take your hands off me unless you
plan to arrest me.” The guards continued their assault and punched Rather in
front of a national audience. Rather continued, “This is the kind of thing that
has been going on outside the hall, this is the first time we’ve had it happen
inside the hall.” Cronkite replied, “I think we’ve got a bunch of thugs here.”
Newsmen Mike Wallace of CBS and John Chancellor and Edwin Newman of NBC were
also roughed up by the guards. Over the following two days, fifteen other
newsmen were attacked by either the police or convention security guards.
Humphrey’s name was put
into nomination as was Sen. George McGovern’s. McGovern was being nominated in
a speech by Sen. Abraham Ribicoff, who stopped in mid-address to tell the
delegates what was going on outside the convention hall. He said, “With George McGovern
as President, we wouldn’t have these Gestapo tactics in the streets of
Chicago.” Daley, sitting just in front of the podium, exploded in anger. He
shook his fist furiously at Ribicff and shouted using the most vitriol
profanity imaginable. Some observers said that threats were made.
Ten
to fifteen thousand gather at Grant Park for speeches and an anti-war rally.
Police and National Guardsmen surround the crowd. During the many speeches,
news of the defeat of the “peace plank” is heard on radio. Young men began to
lower the American flag. Police push through the crowd to arrest them. Another
small group finishes the flag lowering and raises a blood spattered shirt as a
replacement. A line of demonstrators forms between the crowd and the police.
The police charge the line beating some people into unconsciousness.
About 6,000 people break
off from the crowd and move toward the Amphitheatre were the delegates are in
session. The police refuse to allow them to pass. The bridges across the river
are sealed off by the National Guard armed with machine guns and grenade
launchers. Finally, the demonstrators find a single bridge across the river
that has not been closed, and cross. Thousands of people surge onto Michigan
Avenue. James Rochford, the Police Superintendent, orders his officers to clear
the streets.
Scores
of marchers, bystanders, reporters, and medical personnel were severely beaten
by the police. Fumes from the tear gas used by the police (as well as stink
bombs thrown by the protestors) drifted into surrounding buildings. Hundreds
were injured and hundreds were arrested. Many fight back and the attack
intensifies. The conflict lasts only 17 minutes but is filmed by TV crews
positioned on top of the Hilton Hotel. It is seen by the delegates watching monitors
inside the convention hall and by a nationwide TV audience. Five hundred
delegates leave the convention and join the 4,000 protestors in Grant
Park.
THURSDAY 8-29
Humphrey won the
nomination of his party. Today the convention featured an orchestrated
pro-Daley demonstration inside the hall. Hundreds of “We Love You Daley” signs
were carried around the convention hall. This left a sour taste in the mouths
of many delegates; just as the image of Chicago had turned bitter in their
minds.
FRIDAY
8-30
The morning after the
convention ended, at 5:00 A.M., police raid the rooms occupied by supporters of
peace candidate Eugene McCarthy. The police say that objects were allegedly
thrown from their hotel rooms. Originally a small incident, it escalates and
McCarthy campaign workers are beaten.
17 Members of the media were attacked by
the police. 668 Arrested (all Demonstrators) 1 Known death (a Demonstrator)
(During that same week,
308 Americans were killed and 1,144 were wounded in Vietnam)
AFTERMATH
Seven months later, a
Chicago Grand Jury indicted the seven principal organizers of the
demonstrations, “TheChicago
Seven.” They were charged with crossing state lines to incite a riot. Their
trial began in September 1969. Five of them, plus their two attorneys (for
contempt of court), were convicted. Wiener and Froines, were acquitted. All those
convicted were sentenced to five years in prison. In 1972, the Circuit Court of
Appeals reversed all convictions.
Haynes Johnson, a reporter
covering the convention for the Washington Post, wrote,” The 1968 Chicago
convention became a lacerating event, a distillation of a year of heartbreak,
assassinations, riots, and a breakdown in law and order that made it seem as if
the country were coming apart. In its psychic impact, and its long term
political consequences, it eclipsed any other such convention in American
history, destroying faith in politicians, in the political system, in the
country, and in its institutions. No one who was there, or watched it on
television, could escape the memory of what took place before their eyes.”
Saturday, August 25, 2012
THE GREAT CENTRAL PARK ZOO
ESCAPE
On
Monday morning, November 9, 1874, the New York Herald newspaper published a
story that sent the citizens of the city into a panic. The paper reported the
events of the previous afternoon and evening revealing that most of the animals
at the Central Park Zoo had escaped and were roaming city streets; randomly
killing men, women, and children. The paper said that by dawn 49 people were
known dead and over 200 had been injured. The National Guard was called out and
was battling the most ferocious animals block by block. The mayor issued a
proclamation which said, “All citizens are enjoined to keep within their houses
or residences until the wild animals now at large are captured or killed.”
“ESCAPED
ANIMALS ROAM STREETS OF MANHATTAN” shrieked the headlines. “The terrible events
of yesterday - the bursting forth of the most ferocious of the beasts within
the menagerie of the Park, the awful slaughter that ensued, the exciting
conflicts between the infuriated animals, the frightful deaths that followed,
and the destruction of property are making an era in the history of New York
not soon to be forgotten.”
“It is safe to say that at
least 20,000 people filled the various walks and avenues yesterday. To
nine-tenths of the pedestrian visitors, the Menagerie (the zoo) is the chief
source of attraction. . . This writer stood within a hundred yards of the
menagerie when the first ominous symptoms of the approaching catastrophe were
heard. . . The crowd fled in all directions, women falling as they ran and no
one staying to help them up”
“The
huge rhinoceros had broken loose. He had apparently made no more of the massive
barrier that enclosed him than that of a sheet of pasteboard.” The rhino had
broken open the pens reserved for the truly dangerous animals. “The lion
bounded into the center aisle of the building and three cages containing the
black and spotted leopards, the tiger and tigresses, the black wolf and the
spotted hyenas were sprung. . . It was followed by a series of fights between
the liberated beasts.”
“They’re coming; they’re
all loose,” the account continued. “Police armed with revolvers and citizens
with rifles were on the grounds. . . Toward Fifth Avenue came the Numidia lion,
with a series of bounds. So sudden, fierce, and powerful was the leap he made
into the midst of the storming party that he scattered half a hundred armed and
unarmed men.”
The
animals continued their rampage. An anaconda attempted to eat a giraffe, a
Bengal Tiger was shot on Madison Avenue, a panther attacked worshipers inside a
church, and another tiger leaped on to a ferryboat. A list of specific names of
the mutilated and trampled people was included in the article. The front page
story was six columns wide and ran to 10,000 words describing the carnage in
bloody detail. The article caused widespread panic across the city.
The people who didn’t read
all the way to the end of the story missed an important detail, however. The last paragraph read, “Of course the
entire story given above is a pure fabrication. Not one word of it is true. Not
a single act or incident described has taken place.” WHAT? WHY?
The
New York Herald was one of the most widely read newspapers of its day. Its
publisher, James Gordon Bennett Jr., had taken over the business from his
father only a few years before. He was eager to establish his own reputation.
He had financed Henry Stanley’s search for Dr. Livingstone; but now he wanted
to take another step to advance his own power and authority. Bennett was among
the elite of New York City and was well known for bragging about his influence.
He claimed that he had so much control over New York that he could keep the
entire city in their houses for a whole day. At long last, someone called him
on his boast, and made a bet with the young show off.
Bennett had proven his
point, in a most unethical way, with his fictitious story of the animal
escapes. Competing newspapers in New York, and across the country, deplored the
hoax. The New York Times wrote, “If charming sketches of dead children and
dying old ladies does not move the reader to roars of laughter, his sense of
fun must be somewhat different from that with which the proprietor of the New
York Herald has been endowed.”
The New York Herald never
offered an apology. No charges were ever brought against the paper. And James
Gordon Bennett Jr. sang his own praises for another half century.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
A #2 PENCIL AND A DREAM
CAN TAKE YOU ANYWHERE
Since
ancient times, the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans used metal lead styluses to
scratch images onto papyrus. Not exactly a pencil but the idea was there. About
1500 a large deposit of crystallized carbon was found in Cumbria, England. The
local farmers used it to mark their livestock. The material was very pure and
solid. Today we know it as graphite.
The economic value of
graphite was huge and the Royal Family knew it. They took over and guarded all
the graphite mine deposits in the kingdom. But crude pencils were still made
out of graphite sticks smuggled out of the mines. For years England maintained
a monopoly on the production of stick pencils.
The
French and the Germans, with no pure graphite, were not able to compete with
the English for almost 200 years. Then they invented a way to use powdered
graphite (a poorer quality than solid graphite but it was all they had). They
mixed the powder with sulfur and antimony to make at least acceptable pencil
sticks. About the same time, two Italians devised a way to encase the graphite
powder sticks in hollowed-out Juniper wood, and the modern type pencil was
created.
In 1795, Frenchman
Nicholas Conte discovered a method of mixing graphite powder with clay and
baking it in a kiln. By changing the ratio of powder and clay, the hardness of
the pencil rod could be varied, thus giving us the wide range of pencil
softness we have today. Sixty years later, Hymen Lipan invented the attached
eraser fixed to the end of the pencil; although outside of America, people use
pencils without attached erasers.
During
the 19th Century, Eberhard Faber and Joseph Dixon, two pencil
moguls, established techniques to mass-produce the common pencil and lower the
cost. By 1900 240,000 pencils were sold per day in the United States. Red Cedar
and Incense Cedar woods are used as they didn’t splinter when the pencil is
sharpened. The colors that pencils are painted vary by country. Americans like
yellow, Germans and Brazilians prefer green or blue, southern Europeans like
red or black, Australians favor red pencils with black rings, and Indians dark
red with black lines. Today, nearly 14 billion pencils are produced annually
worldwide.
Many famous people chose
pencils over pens. Benjamin Franklin sold pencils, George Washington surveyed
with them; John Steinbeck, Ernest Hemingway, and Vladimir Nabokov only wrote
with pencils, and Henry David Thoreau actually designed pencils before becoming
a recluse; his father owned a pencil making company.
Here is some interesting
pencil trivia for you:
The average pencil holds
enough graphite to draw a line 35 miles long or write 45,000 words, depending
on how often and how much you sharpened it. (We wonder who tested this theory?)
The
French came up with the idea of using rubber to erase pencil marks. Previously,
writers removed mistakes with bread crumbs.
Eberhard Faber built the
first American factory to mass-produce pencils in 1861. Just in time to make
pencils standard issue for every Union soldier during the Civil War.
Today, more than half of
all lead pencils are made in China. They produce about 7 billion per year.
(Enough so that each Chinese person can have their own)
Early American space
missions included pencils among their tools but scientists were worried about
the inflammability of wooden pencils in a pure oxygen environment. After the
Apollo I fire, pencils were banned in favor of pens.
The
world’s largest pencil was manufactured in New York City in 2007 by Ashrita
Furman, a professional setter of Guinness records (he has over 300). His pencil
is 76 feet long, weighs 18,000 lbs. (4,500 lbs. are graphite) and cost him
$20,000 to build.
If you accidently stab
yourself with a pencil point, don’t worry about lead poisoning. Lead pencils
have never contained lead; only clay and graphite. BUT until a few years ago,
the yellow paint used on the pencil may have contained lead, so it shouldn’t be
chewed on.
The average pencil is
seven inches long, with just a half-inch eraser. So take heart, optimism is not
dead.
Sunday, August 19, 2012
WHOA NELLIE!! BREAKING THE
MOLD
Elizabeth
Jane Cochran was born near Pittsburgh in 1864. She always wanted to be
different, to stand out from the crowd. She used the nickname “Pink” and
changed her last name to Cochrane (adding the “e” to make it more
sophisticated). A typical teenager? Maybe. But the rest of her life was as
different as it could possibly be for an American woman in the 19th
Century.
When
the family moved to Pittsburgh in 1880, young Elizabeth became exposed to the
city’s newspapers and loved reading them. She dreamed of finding work as a
newspaper writer. One day, see read an editorial critical of the new women’s
movement. It proclaimed that women belonged in the home doing domestic tasks
like cooking, cleaning, and raising children. The editorial stated that working
women were a “monstrosity.” Elizabeth fired off a letter to the editor refuting
the articles conclusions. The paper’s editor was so impressed with her
arguments that he hired her to write for it.
At that time, no female
reporter ever used her real name in the newspapers. They always had a pen name,
many men did the same. That suited Elizabeth just fine, she liked the idea. The
name that stuck was NELLIE BLY. It was taken from the popular song “Nelly Bly”
written by a fellow Pittsburgher, the composer Stephen Foster. Foster died the
same year that Elizabeth was born.
Her
early articles were about the hardships of working women, calling for reform of
the state’s divorce laws, and the life of a factory girl in Pittsburgh. She
once posed as a poor sweatshop worker to expose the cruelty under which women
worked. When the shop owners threatened to pull their newspaper advertising,
the paper took Nellie off her assignments and put her on the flower show
circuit. Nellie hated it. She decided to accept the paper’s six month
assignment in Mexico to write about life there. Of course, Nellie decided to
focus on the poverty and political corruption in the country. Soon the articles
got her ejected from Mexico.
Upon returning to the U.S.
in 1887, Nellie decided to skip Pittsburgh and try her journalistic hand in New
York City. She was able to talk her way into a reporter’s job with “The York
World” paper (owned by Joseph Pulitzer).
Her first assignment was
to go undercover by feigning insanity and getting herself admitted at the
Women’s Lunatic Asylum to investigate reports of brutality and neglect at that
institution. After impersonating a “mad” person, she returned 10 days later
with
stories of cruel beatings, ice cold baths, and forced meals. Her expose’
prompted a grand jury to launch its own investigation which led to many changes
in the system.
At that time, such stories
were called “stunt reporting’ where women reporters risked their reputations to
enter into the man’s world of journalism. In fact, Nellie Bly at the age of 23
was the inventor of our modern investigative journalism. Nellie’s personality
was always part of her articles. She didn’t hide her feelings and reactions to
whatever story she covered.
Nellie
Bly reached the peak of her fame in 1889. The “New York World” thought it would
be a good idea, and sell papers, to stage a race with another paper to send a
man around the world to break the fictional record in Jules Verne’s book
“Around the World in Eighty Days.” Nellie threatened to do it in even less time
for another newspaper if they didn’t agree to send her instead of a man. They
relented. She competed against another women reporter from Cosmopolitan, going
in the opposite direction.
On November 14th,
Nellie began her journey in New Jersey with only about $300 (in a bag tied
around her neck) and a few clothes in a small suitcase. The newspaper conducted
a contest with readers to see who could predict her total time. They sold a lot
of papers. She traveled by ship, train, rickshaw, burro, or anything to make
the necessary connections.
Nellie
arrived back on January 25, 1890. It took her 72 days, 6 hours, 11 minutes, and
14 seconds to circumnavigate the globe. She was greeted by crowds, bands,
fireworks, and a parade. Nellie Bly was thrust into the world’s spotlight.
Her lasting contribution,
however, was to publicize women’s rights issues. She also exposed injustice and
corruption in public and private sectors, and prompted many social reforms.
Nellie also became a trailblazer for women in a male dominated profession, and
was the originator of investigative journalism.